On the Abuse and Limits of Lawyer Discipline

Citation
Title:
On the Abuse and Limits of Lawyer Discipline
Author:
Year: 
Publication: 
Volume: 
Issue: 
Start Page: 
End Page: 
Publisher: 
Language: 
English
URL: 
Select license: 
Select License
DOI: 
PMID: 
ISSN: 
Abstract:

On the Abuse and Limits of Lawyer Discipline

Vincent R. Johnson

44 Conn. L. Rev. 53 (2012).

    Despite being routinely underfunded, lawyer disciplinary processes must operate in ways that merit the confidence of both society at large and the American legal profession.  This means that those who participate in lawyer grievance adjudication must be vigilant against systemic abuse (whether deliberate or unintentional) and mindful of factors that limit institutional competence.  This Essay argues that, in many instances, disciplinary authorities should abstain from deciding grievances that would require them to rule on unresolved scientific questions, particularly if controversial matters are involved.  The Essay further urges that grievance rulings must be consistent with American constitutional principles which favor robust debate of public issues and hold that even unpopular parties have a right to legal counsel.  A lawyer should never be subject to discipline based on allegedly misleading advertising absent persuasive evidence that the lawyer knowingly, recklessly, or negligently made a provably false assertion of fact.

Keywords: lawyer discipline, lawyer disciplinary processes, lawyer grievance adjudication, American constitutional principles, legal advertising, legal responsibility, Crowell & Moring LLP, consanguinity, scientific controversy, law of defamation, stereotyping, First Amendment, free speech.

Author Abstracted

Comments
  • Recommend Us